num -is:module

Parse an integral number.
Basic numeric class. The Haskell Report defines no laws for Num. However, (+) and (*) are customarily expected to define a ring and have the following properties:
  • Associativity of (+) (x + y) + z = x + (y + z)
  • Commutativity of (+) x + y = y + x
  • fromInteger 0 is the additive identity x + fromInteger 0 = x
  • negate gives the additive inverse x + negate x = fromInteger 0
  • Associativity of (*) (x * y) * z = x * (y * z)
  • fromInteger 1 is the multiplicative identity x * fromInteger 1 = x and fromInteger 1 * x = x
  • Distributivity of (*) with respect to (+) a * (b + c) = (a * b) + (a * c) and (b + c) * a = (b * a) + (c * a)
  • Coherence with toInteger if the type also implements Integral, then fromInteger is a left inverse for toInteger, i.e. fromInteger (toInteger i) == i
Note that it isn't customarily expected that a type instance of both Num and Ord implement an ordered ring. Indeed, in base only Integer and Rational do.
Basic numeric class. The Haskell Report defines no laws for Num. However, (+) and (*) are customarily expected to define a ring and have the following properties:
  • Associativity of (+) (x + y) + z = x + (y + z)
  • Commutativity of (+) x + y = y + x
  • fromInteger 0 is the additive identity x + fromInteger 0 = x
  • negate gives the additive inverse x + negate x = fromInteger 0
  • Associativity of (*) (x * y) * z = x * (y * z)
  • fromInteger 1 is the multiplicative identity x * fromInteger 1 = x and fromInteger 1 * x = x
  • Distributivity of (*) with respect to (+) a * (b + c) = (a * b) + (a * c) and (b + c) * a = (b * a) + (c * a)
  • Coherence with toInteger if the type also implements Integral, then fromInteger is a left inverse for toInteger, i.e. fromInteger (toInteger i) == i
Note that it isn't customarily expected that a type instance of both Num and Ord implement an ordered ring. Indeed, in base only Integer and Rational do.
Basic numeric class. The Haskell Report defines no laws for Num. However, (+) and (*) are customarily expected to define a ring and have the following properties:
  • Associativity of (+) (x + y) + z = x + (y + z)
  • Commutativity of (+) x + y = y + x
  • fromInteger 0 is the additive identity x + fromInteger 0 = x
  • negate gives the additive inverse x + negate x = fromInteger 0
  • Associativity of (*) (x * y) * z = x * (y * z)
  • fromInteger 1 is the multiplicative identity x * fromInteger 1 = x and fromInteger 1 * x = x
  • Distributivity of (*) with respect to (+) a * (b + c) = (a * b) + (a * c) and (b + c) * a = (b * a) + (c * a)
Note that it isn't customarily expected that a type instance of both Num and Ord implement an ordered ring. Indeed, in base only Integer and Rational do.
Basic numeric class.
Basic numeric class. The Haskell Report defines no laws for Num. However, '(+)' and '(*)' are customarily expected to define a ring and have the following properties:
  • Associativity of (+) (x + y) + z = x + (y + z)
  • Commutativity of (+) x + y = y + x
  • fromInteger 0 is the additive identity x + fromInteger 0 = x
  • negate gives the additive inverse x + negate x = fromInteger 0
  • Associativity of (*) (x * y) * z = x * (y * z)
  • fromInteger 1 is the multiplicative identity x * fromInteger 1 = x and fromInteger 1 * x = x
  • Distributivity of (*) with respect to (+) a * (b + c) = (a * b) + (a * c) and (b + c) * a = (b * a) + (c * a)
Note that it isn't customarily expected that a type instance of both Num and Ord implement an ordered ring. Indeed, in base only Integer and Rational do.
x * 2 ^ y
Simple coordinate in current user coordinate.
NUM Corresponds to the `#NUM`! error.
Basic numeric class. The Haskell Report defines no laws for Num. However, (+) and (*) are customarily expected to define a ring and have the following properties:
  • Associativity of (+) (x + y) + z = x + (y + z)
  • Commutativity of (+) x + y = y + x
  • fromInteger 0 is the additive identity x + fromInteger 0 = x
  • negate gives the additive inverse x + negate x = fromInteger 0
  • Associativity of (*) (x * y) * z = x * (y * z)
  • fromInteger 1 is the multiplicative identity x * fromInteger 1 = x and fromInteger 1 * x = x
  • Distributivity of (*) with respect to (+) a * (b + c) = (a * b) + (a * c) and (b + c) * a = (b * a) + (c * a)
Note that it isn't customarily expected that a type instance of both Num and Ord implement an ordered ring. Indeed, in base only Integer and Rational do.
Extract the numerator of the ratio in reduced form: the numerator and denominator have no common factor and the denominator is positive.
The number of elements in the array.