num -is:module
Parse an integral number.
Basic numeric class.
The Haskell Report defines no laws for
Num. However,
(+) and
(*) are customarily expected
to define a ring and have the following properties:
- Associativity of (+) (x + y) +
z = x + (y + z)
- Commutativity of (+) x + y
= y + x
- fromInteger 0 is the additive
identity x + fromInteger 0 = x
- negate gives the additive inverse x +
negate x = fromInteger 0
- Associativity of (*) (x * y) *
z = x * (y * z)
- fromInteger 1 is the multiplicative
identity x * fromInteger 1 = x and
fromInteger 1 * x = x
- Distributivity of (*) with respect to
(+) a * (b + c) = (a * b) + (a *
c) and (b + c) * a = (b * a) + (c * a)
- Coherence with toInteger if the type also
implements Integral, then fromInteger is a left inverse
for toInteger, i.e. fromInteger (toInteger i) ==
i
Note that it
isn't customarily expected that a type instance of
both
Num and
Ord implement an ordered ring. Indeed, in
base only
Integer and
Rational do.
hedgehog Hedgehog.Internal.Prelude,
base-compat Prelude.Compat,
Cabal-syntax Distribution.Compat.Prelude,
universum Universum.Base,
ihaskell IHaskellPrelude,
numhask NumHask.Prelude,
dimensional Numeric.Units.Dimensional.Prelude,
rebase Rebase.Prelude,
LambdaHack Game.LambdaHack.Core.Prelude,
cabal-install-solver Distribution.Solver.Compat.Prelude,
faktory Faktory.Prelude,
subcategories Control.Subcategory.RebindableSyntax,
vcr Imports Basic numeric class.
The Haskell Report defines no laws for
Num. However,
(+) and
(*) are customarily expected
to define a ring and have the following properties:
- Associativity of (+) (x + y) +
z = x + (y + z)
- Commutativity of (+) x + y
= y + x
- fromInteger 0 is the additive
identity x + fromInteger 0 = x
- negate gives the additive inverse x +
negate x = fromInteger 0
- Associativity of (*) (x * y) *
z = x * (y * z)
- fromInteger 1 is the multiplicative
identity x * fromInteger 1 = x and
fromInteger 1 * x = x
- Distributivity of (*) with respect to
(+) a * (b + c) = (a * b) + (a *
c) and (b + c) * a = (b * a) + (c * a)
- Coherence with toInteger if the type also
implements Integral, then fromInteger is a left inverse
for toInteger, i.e. fromInteger (toInteger i) ==
i
Note that it
isn't customarily expected that a type instance of
both
Num and
Ord implement an ordered ring. Indeed, in
base only
Integer and
Rational do.
Basic numeric class.
The Haskell Report defines no laws for
Num. However,
(+) and
(*) are customarily expected
to define a ring and have the following properties:
- Associativity of (+) (x + y) +
z = x + (y + z)
- Commutativity of (+) x + y
= y + x
- fromInteger 0 is the additive
identity x + fromInteger 0 = x
- negate gives the additive inverse x +
negate x = fromInteger 0
- Associativity of (*) (x * y) *
z = x * (y * z)
- fromInteger 1 is the multiplicative
identity x * fromInteger 1 = x and
fromInteger 1 * x = x
- Distributivity of (*) with respect to
(+) a * (b + c) = (a * b) + (a *
c) and (b + c) * a = (b * a) + (c * a)
Note that it
isn't customarily expected that a type instance of
both
Num and
Ord implement an ordered ring. Indeed, in
base only
Integer and
Rational do.
Basic numeric class.
The Haskell Report defines no laws for
Num. However, '(+)' and
'(*)' are customarily expected to define a ring and have the following
properties:
- Associativity of (+) (x + y) + z = x +
(y + z)
- Commutativity of (+) x + y = y +
x
- fromInteger 0 is the additive identity
x + fromInteger 0 = x
- negate gives the additive inverse x +
negate x = fromInteger 0
- Associativity of (*) (x * y) * z = x *
(y * z)
- fromInteger 1 is the multiplicative
identity x * fromInteger 1 = x and
fromInteger 1 * x = x
- Distributivity of (*) with respect to (+) a * (b
+ c) = (a * b) + (a * c) and (b + c) * a =
(b * a) + (c * a)
Note that it
isn't customarily expected that a type instance of
both
Num and
Ord implement an ordered ring. Indeed, in
base only
Integer and
Rational do.
Simple coordinate in current user coordinate.
NUM Corresponds to the `#NUM`! error.
Basic numeric class.
The Haskell Report defines no laws for
Num. However,
(+) and
(*) are customarily expected
to define a ring and have the following properties:
- Associativity of (+) (x + y) +
z = x + (y + z)
- Commutativity of (+) x + y
= y + x
- fromInteger 0 is the additive
identity x + fromInteger 0 = x
- negate gives the additive inverse x +
negate x = fromInteger 0
- Associativity of (*) (x * y) *
z = x * (y * z)
- fromInteger 1 is the multiplicative
identity x * fromInteger 1 = x and
fromInteger 1 * x = x
- Distributivity of (*) with respect to
(+) a * (b + c) = (a * b) + (a *
c) and (b + c) * a = (b * a) + (c * a)
Note that it
isn't customarily expected that a type instance of
both
Num and
Ord implement an ordered ring. Indeed, in
base only
Integer and
Rational do.
Extract the numerator of the ratio in reduced form: the numerator and
denominator have no common factor and the denominator is positive.
The number of elements in the array.