sortOn -package:rrb-vector

Sort a list by comparing the results of a key function applied to each element. sortOn f is equivalent to sortBy (comparing f), but has the performance advantage of only evaluating f once for each element in the input list. This is called the decorate-sort-undecorate paradigm, or Schwartzian transform. Elements are arranged from lowest to highest, keeping duplicates in the order they appeared in the input. The argument must be finite.

Examples

>>> sortOn fst [(2, "world"), (4, "!"), (1, "Hello")]
[(1,"Hello"),(2,"world"),(4,"!")]
>>> sortOn length ["jim", "creed", "pam", "michael", "dwight", "kevin"]
["jim","pam","creed","kevin","dwight","michael"]

Performance notes

This function minimises the projections performed, by materialising the projections in an intermediate list. For trivial projections, you should prefer using sortBy with comparing, for example:
>>> sortBy (comparing fst) [(3, 1), (2, 2), (1, 3)]
[(1,3),(2,2),(3,1)]
Or, for the exact same API as sortOn, you can use `sortBy . comparing`:
>>> (sortBy . comparing) fst [(3, 1), (2, 2), (1, 3)]
[(1,3),(2,2),(3,1)]
Sort a NonEmpty on a user-supplied projection of its elements. See sortOn for more detailed information.

Examples

>>> sortOn fst $ (2, "world") :| [(4, "!"), (1, "Hello")]
(1,"Hello") :| [(2,"world"),(4,"!")]
>>> sortOn List.length ("jim" :| ["creed", "pam", "michael", "dwight", "kevin"])
"jim" :| ["pam","creed","kevin","dwight","michael"]

Performance notes

This function minimises the projections performed, by materialising the projections in an intermediate list. For trivial projections, you should prefer using sortBy with comparing, for example:
>>> sortBy (comparing fst) $ (3, 1) :| [(2, 2), (1, 3)]
(1,3) :| [(2,2),(3,1)]
Or, for the exact same API as sortOn, you can use `sortBy . comparing`:
>>> (sortBy . comparing) fst $ (3, 1) :| [(2, 2), (1, 3)]
(1,3) :| [(2,2),(3,1)]
sortWith is an alias for `sortBy . comparing`.
sortOn sorts the specified Seq by comparing the results of a key function applied to each element. The sort is stable, meaning the order of equal elements is preserved. sortOn f is equivalent to sortBy (compare `on` f), but has the performance advantage of only evaluating f once for each element in the input Seq. An example of using sortOn might be to sort a Seq of strings according to their length:
sortOn length (fromList ["alligator", "monkey", "zebra"]) == fromList ["zebra", "monkey", "alligator"]
If, instead, sortBy had been used, length would be evaluated on every comparison, giving <math> evaluations, rather than <math>. If f is very cheap (for example a record selector, or fst), sortBy (compare `on` f) will be faster than sortOn f.
Sort by comparing the results of a function applied to each element. The sort is stable, and the function is evaluated only once for each element.
Sort a NonEmpty on a user-supplied projection of its elements. See sortOn for more detailed information.

Examples

>>> sortOn fst $ (2, "world") :| [(4, "!"), (1, "Hello")]
(1,"Hello") :| [(2,"world"),(4,"!")]
>>> sortOn length $ "jim" :| ["creed", "pam", "michael", "dwight", "kevin"]
"jim" :| ["pam","creed","kevin","dwight","michael"]

Performance notes

This function minimises the projections performed, by materialising the projections in an intermediate list. For trivial projections, you should prefer using sortBy with comparing, for example:
>>> sortBy (comparing fst) $ (3, 1) :| [(2, 2), (1, 3)]
(1,3) :| [(2,2),(3,1)]
Or, for the exact same API as sortOn, you can use `sortBy . comparing`:
>>> (sortBy . comparing) fst $ (3, 1) :| [(2, 2), (1, 3)]
(1,3) :| [(2,2),(3,1)]
sortWith is an alias for `sortBy . comparing`. Since: 4.20.0.0
Sort a list by comparing the results of a key function applied to each element. sortOn f is equivalent to sortBy (comparing f), but has the performance advantage of only evaluating f once for each element in the input list. This is called the decorate-sort-undecorate paradigm, or Schwartzian transform. Elements are arranged from lowest to highest, keeping duplicates in the order they appeared in the input. The argument must be finite.

Examples

>>> sortOn fst [(2, "world"), (4, "!"), (1, "Hello")]
[(1,"Hello"),(2,"world"),(4,"!")]
>>> sortOn length ["jim", "creed", "pam", "michael", "dwight", "kevin"]
["jim","pam","creed","kevin","dwight","michael"]

Performance notes

This function minimises the projections performed, by materialising the projections in an intermediate list. For trivial projections, you should prefer using sortBy with comparing, for example:
>>> sortBy (comparing fst) [(3, 1), (2, 2), (1, 3)]
[(1,3),(2,2),(3,1)]
Or, for the exact same API as sortOn, you can use `sortBy . comparing`:
>>> (sortBy . comparing) fst [(3, 1), (2, 2), (1, 3)]
[(1,3),(2,2),(3,1)]
@since base-4.8.0.0
Sort a list by comparing the results of a key function applied to each element. sortOn f is equivalent to sortBy (comparing f), but has the performance advantage of only evaluating f once for each element in the input list. This is called the decorate-sort-undecorate paradigm, or Schwartzian transform. Elements are arranged from from lowest to highest, keeping duplicates in the order they appeared in the input.
>>> sortOn fst [(2, "world"), (4, "!"), (1, "Hello")]
[(1,"Hello"),(2,"world"),(4,"!")]
Same as sortBy . comparing. Since 0.7.0
Sort a list by comparing the results of a key function applied to each element. sortOn f is equivalent to sortBy (comparing f), but has the performance advantage of only evaluating f once for each element in the input list. This is called the decorate-sort-undecorate paradigm, or Schwartzian transform. Elements are arranged from lowest to highest, keeping duplicates in the order they appeared in the input.
>>> sortOn fst [(2, "world"), (4, "!"), (1, "Hello")]
[(1,"Hello"),(2,"world"),(4,"!")]
Return a list of the elements of the given Shell, sorted after applying the given function and keeping duplicates:
>>> sortOn id (select [1,4,2,3,3,7])
[1,2,3,3,4,7]
The sortOn function provides the decorate-sort-undecorate idiom, also known as the "Schwartzian transform".
Sort a list by comparing the results of a key function applied to each element. sortOn f is equivalent to sortBy (comparing f), but has the performance advantage of only evaluating f once for each element in the input list. This is called the decorate-sort-undecorate paradigm, or Schwartzian transform. Elements are arranged from lowest to highest, keeping duplicates in the order they appeared in the input.
>>> sortOn fst [(2, "world"), (4, "!"), (1, "Hello")]
[(1,"Hello"),(2,"world"),(4,"!")]
The argument must be finite.
sortOn sorts the specified NESeq by comparing the results of a key function applied to each element. sortOn f is equivalent to sortBy (compare `on` f), but has the performance advantage of only evaluating f once for each element in the input list. This is called the decorate-sort-undecorate paradigm, or Schwartzian transform. An example of using sortOn might be to sort a NESeq of strings according to their length:
sortOn length (fromList ("alligator" :| ["monkey", "zebra"])) == fromList ("zebra" :| ["monkey", "alligator"])
If, instead, sortBy had been used, length would be evaluated on every comparison, giving <math> evaluations, rather than <math>. If f is very cheap (for example a record selector, or fst), sortBy (compare `on` f) will be faster than sortOn f.
Sort a list by comparing the results of a key function applied to each element. sortOn f is equivalent to sortBy (comparing f), but has the performance advantage of only evaluating f once for each element in the input list. This is called the decorate-sort-undecorate paradigm, or Schwartzian transform. Elements are arranged from lowest to highest, keeping duplicates in the order they appeared in the input. The argument must be finite.

Examples

>>> sortOn fst [(2, "world"), (4, "!"), (1, "Hello")]
[(1,"Hello"),(2,"world"),(4,"!")]
>>> sortOn length ["jim", "creed", "pam", "michael", "dwight", "kevin"]
["jim","pam","creed","kevin","dwight","michael"]
Sort a list by comparing the results of a key function applied to each element. sortOn f is equivalent to sortBy (comparing f), but has the performance advantage of only evaluating f once for each element in the input list. This is called the decorate-sort-undecorate paradigm, or Schwartzian transform.
O(n log n). Sorts a list by comparing the results of a key function applied to each element. sortOn f is equivalent to sortBy (comparing f), but has the performance advantage of only evaluating f once for each element in the input list. This is called the decorate-sort-undecorate paradigm, or Schwartzian transform. Elements are arranged from lowest to highest, keeping duplicates in the order they appeared in the input.
>>> sortOn fst $ slist [(2, "world"), (4, "!"), (1, "Hello")]
Slist {sList = [(1,"Hello"),(2,"world"),(4,"!")], sSize = Size 3}
Note: this function hangs on infinite slists.
Sort a list by applying a function to each element and comparing the results.
sortOn negate (mk6 1 4 2 8 5 7) === mk6 8 7 5 4 2 1
This variant of sortOn recomputes the sorting key every comparison. This can be better for functions that are cheap to compute. This is definitely better for projections, as the decorate-sort-undecorate saves nothing and adds two traversals of the list and extra memory allocation.
unstableSortOn sorts the specified Seq by comparing the results of a key function applied to each element. unstableSortOn f is equivalent to unstableSortBy (compare `on` f), but has the performance advantage of only evaluating f once for each element in the input Seq. An example of using unstableSortOn might be to sort a Seq of strings according to their length:
unstableSortOn length (fromList ["alligator", "monkey", "zebra"]) == fromList ["zebra", "monkey", "alligator"]
If, instead, unstableSortBy had been used, length would be evaluated on every comparison, giving <math> evaluations, rather than <math>. If f is very cheap (for example a record selector, or fst), unstableSortBy (compare `on` f) will be faster than unstableSortOn f.
A combination of group and sort, using a part of the value to compare on.
groupSortOn length ["test","of","sized","item"] == [["of"],["test","item"],["sized"]]
A version of nubSort which operates on a portion of the value.
nubSortOn length ["a","test","of","this"] == ["a","of","test"]
The nubSortOn function provides decorate-sort-undecorate for nubSort.